1996-06-03 - Re: [Off-Topic] “Curfews”

Header Data

From: Alan Horowitz <alanh@infi.net>
To: jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
Message Hash: a3178f2fe3f80b50bb6e0d3bd49a8761b2a7227f69a72e51473c1f0efed872d3
Message ID: <Pine.SV4.3.91.960602171909.881E-100000@larry.infi.net>
Reply To: <199606021726.KAA29200@mail.pacifier.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-06-03 00:23:21 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 3 Jun 1996 08:23:21 +0800

Raw message

From: Alan Horowitz <alanh@infi.net>
Date: Mon, 3 Jun 1996 08:23:21 +0800
To: jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
Subject: Re: [Off-Topic] "Curfews"
In-Reply-To: <199606021726.KAA29200@mail.pacifier.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.SV4.3.91.960602171909.881E-100000@larry.infi.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


I'm more concerned about the other side of the coin.

The next time there's street riots because a jury decided to think for 
itself, will the ACLU be issuing quota guidelines that mandate that all 
black arrestees above (percentage-of-population) be given a 
"get-out-of-jail-free-for-pulling-a-bystanding-trucker-out-of-his-cab-and 
slamming-his-head-with-bricks" card?





Thread