1996-06-19 - Re: Federal key registration agency

Header Data

From: Anonymous User <nobody@c2.org>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: ad1f744721e1757f2e078ac7a9234be1325a1cae798f5b980af193aca51bb057
Message ID: <199606190505.WAA12079@infinity.c2.org>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-06-19 13:04:50 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 19 Jun 1996 21:04:50 +0800

Raw message

From: Anonymous User <nobody@c2.org>
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 1996 21:04:50 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Federal key registration agency
Message-ID: <199606190505.WAA12079@infinity.c2.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


>Compuserve Online Today Daily Edition, 15 June 1996:
>
>Speaking to the Commonwealth Club of California in San Francisco, Reno said
>her plan would require people to register with the new agency the secret
>codes -- or "keys" -- they use to encrypt messages online.
>
>Reporting on this speech, Sandra Ann Harris of United Press International
>adds, "Federal authorities could then obtain the information they need to
>decipher the encryptions using a court order and secretly monitor electronic
>communication on the Internet the same way wiretaps are used to monitor
>telephone conversations of suspected criminals."

   Consider the logic of this statement.  If some *criminal* has registered his/her secret key with the government, then why the hell would s/he then encrypt an incrimating message knowing the government could crack it?!
   Great plan, Janet.....


Medea








Thread