1996-06-26 - Re: AT&T bans anonymous messages

Header Data

From: Intense <exalt@miworld.net>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: ee51e3b3f96b5574123138aeac50d6dc76301d6c8157eb7afb385c4a2e3d05e8
Message ID: <Pine.LNX.3.91.960625230149.659A-100000@invictor.miworld.net>
Reply To: <Pine.GUL.3.93.960625113555.328B-100000@Networking.Stanford.EDU>
UTC Datetime: 1996-06-26 07:58:39 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 26 Jun 1996 15:58:39 +0800

Raw message

From: Intense <exalt@miworld.net>
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 1996 15:58:39 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: AT&T bans anonymous messages
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GUL.3.93.960625113555.328B-100000@Networking.Stanford.EDU>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.91.960625230149.659A-100000@invictor.miworld.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


On Tue, 25 Jun 1996, Rich Graves wrote:

> given username. If you send a message traceable to AT&T, they are held
> accountable. I think it's reasonable for them to demand that you make
> messages traceable to yourself so that you are held accountable. 

Under the common carrier law, i do not think that would apply

Thread

• Return to June 1996

• Return to “Adam Shostack <adam@homeport.org>”
• Return to “Hal <hfinney@shell.portal.com>”
• Return to “Intense <exalt@miworld.net>”
• Return to “Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>”

• Return to “WorldNet User <anonymous-user@worldnet.att.net>”

• 1996-06-25 (Tue, 25 Jun 1996 13:19:26 +0800) - AT&T bans anonymous messages - WorldNet User <anonymous-user@worldnet.att.net>
  • 1996-06-25 (Wed, 26 Jun 1996 05:40:28 +0800) - Re: AT&T bans anonymous messages - Hal <hfinney@shell.portal.com>
    • 1996-06-26 (Wed, 26 Jun 1996 08:15:57 +0800) - Re: AT&T bans anonymous messages - Adam Shostack <adam@homeport.org>
  • 1996-06-26 (Wed, 26 Jun 1996 09:22:42 +0800) - Re: AT&T bans anonymous messages - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
    • 1996-06-26 (Wed, 26 Jun 1996 15:58:39 +0800) - Re: AT&T bans anonymous messages - Intense <exalt@miworld.net>
      • 1996-06-27 (Thu, 27 Jun 1996 08:22:57 +0800) - Re: AT&T bans anonymous messages - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>