1996-06-10 - Re: Electronic Signature Act Of 1996

Header Data

From: Greg Broiles <gbroiles@netbox.com>
To: Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>
Message Hash: ef653e61c289efad9d9ff344ca3f09a063b3b6dd4b69dfd133ba41fc131bb0a5
Message ID: <2.2.16.19960610095811.1d4f15ba@mail.io.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-06-10 13:45:24 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 10 Jun 1996 21:45:24 +0800

Raw message

From: Greg Broiles <gbroiles@netbox.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Jun 1996 21:45:24 +0800
To: Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>
Subject: Re: Electronic Signature Act Of 1996
Message-ID: <2.2.16.19960610095811.1d4f15ba@mail.io.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


At 04:24 PM 6/5/96 -0400, Black Unicorn wrote:

>Please remember that the UCC's application is generally restricted to the 
>sales of goods or acts between merchants.

I'll "remember" this only insofar as it reminds me to read your other
messages with a more skeptical eye. I hope you pay more attention to
accuracy when you're at work.

--
Greg Broiles                |"Post-rotational nystagmus was the subject of
gbroiles@netbox.com         |an in-court demonstration by the People
http://www.io.com/~gbroiles |wherein Sgt Page was spun around by Sgt
                            |Studdard." People v. Quinn 580 NYS2d 818,825.






Thread