1996-07-26 - RE: Schelling Points, Rights, and Game Theory–Part II

Header Data

From: frantz@netcom.com (Bill Frantz)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 12fd2acfc8acd1e8030a85451351d58aa1a59cecf3358fa8c1c065d03309c5a7
Message ID: <199607261837.LAA24288@netcom8.netcom.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-07-26 23:41:09 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 27 Jul 1996 07:41:09 +0800

Raw message

From: frantz@netcom.com (Bill Frantz)
Date: Sat, 27 Jul 1996 07:41:09 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: RE: Schelling Points, Rights, and Game Theory--Part II
Message-ID: <199607261837.LAA24288@netcom8.netcom.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


At  9:09 AM 7/26/96 -0700, Timothy C. May wrote:
>... I hate the term "nerd," as I hate the
>names "dweeb," "geek," "jerk," etc. Believe me, anyone who thinks being
>called a "nerd" is complimentary, or anyone who labels himself as a "geek,"
>is probably one who would call himself a "nigger," or a "queer.")

I must disagree with Tim on this issue.  Back in the dark ages, before the
revolution, the Yankee was an insult used by British sympathisers to
describe the hick American revolutionaries.  The Americans adopted it as a
matter of pride and threw it back in their detractors face.  

Homosexuals are doing the same thing with the them "queer".  When I went to
Dan Farmer and Wietse Venema's class in Internet Security, Dan taught the
class wearing a tank-top which said "QUEER" across the front.

People with pride in themselves and what they do can make their detractors
eat their insults.  We should make it clear that "nerd," "dweeb," "geek,"
"jerk," etc. are where the money is.  We should turn them into terms of
pride in what we are and what we do.

Bill


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bill Frantz       | Cave ab homine unius lebri | Periwinkle -- Consulting
(408)356-8506     |  [Beware the man of one    | 16345 Englewood Ave.
frantz@netcom.com |   book]  - Anonymous Latin | Los Gatos, CA 95032, USA







Thread