1996-07-06 - Re: Net and Terrorism.

Header Data

From: Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
To: jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
Message Hash: 20376214064c76d879353142ca9422340c9ecf78a1abce50677b69d06d1b24a6
Message ID: <Pine.GUL.3.94.960705141231.20370B-100000@Networking.Stanford.EDU>
Reply To: <199607051652.JAA15062@mail.pacifier.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-07-06 00:50:48 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 6 Jul 1996 08:50:48 +0800

Raw message

From: Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
Date: Sat, 6 Jul 1996 08:50:48 +0800
To: jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
Subject: Re: Net and Terrorism.
In-Reply-To: <199607051652.JAA15062@mail.pacifier.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.GUL.3.94.960705141231.20370B-100000@Networking.Stanford.EDU>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


On Fri, 5 Jul 1996, jim bell wrote:

> If anything, I think the public would be far better off if there was a 
> mechanism to allow even these "terrorists" to speak directly to the public, 
> without censorship by the governments or heightened risk of capture.

Er, they have that. It's just that most people don't give a shit for their
kind of nonsense, so they don't listen, so the kooks turn to bombings as PR
stunts. Nobody would have read the UnaSpew if Uncle Ted hadn't bombed a few
people. Nobody is going to listen to Jim Bell until you claim credit for
killing some people.

-rich






Thread