1996-07-10 - Re: more about the usefulness of PGP

Header Data

From: Derek Atkins <warlord@MIT.EDU>
To: bryce@digicash.com
Message Hash: 226d81b52e0cb52c85a1a8e2da8705328bc80860686ef099f08f07e2e2da961e
Message ID: <199607101544.LAA26047@toxicwaste.media.mit.edu>
Reply To: <199607101116.NAA17386@digicash.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-07-10 20:40:30 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 11 Jul 1996 04:40:30 +0800

Raw message

From: Derek Atkins <warlord@MIT.EDU>
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 1996 04:40:30 +0800
To: bryce@digicash.com
Subject: Re: more about the usefulness of PGP
In-Reply-To: <199607101116.NAA17386@digicash.com>
Message-ID: <199607101544.LAA26047@toxicwaste.media.mit.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


> authenticated message (I'm not sure if PGP's built-in timestamp
> is authenticated.  Anyone?), save the latest timestamp which you

Yes, the timestamp in a PGP signature is authenticated.  The hash is
run over the signature data.

-derek

Thread

• Return to July 1996

• Return to “bryce@digicash.com”
• Return to “Derek Atkins <warlord@MIT.EDU>”
• Return to “ichudov@algebra.com (Igor Chudov @ home)”

• Return to “Matthew Carpenter <mcarpent@mailhost.tcs.tulane.edu>”

• 1996-07-06 (Sun, 7 Jul 1996 06:51:00 +0800) - more about the usefulness of PGP - bryce@digicash.com
  • 1996-07-07 (Sun, 7 Jul 1996 10:18:06 +0800) - Re: more about the usefulness of PGP - ichudov@algebra.com (Igor Chudov @ home)
  • 1996-07-10 (Wed, 10 Jul 1996 15:09:27 +0800) - Re: more about the usefulness of PGP - Matthew Carpenter <mcarpent@mailhost.tcs.tulane.edu>
    • 1996-07-10 (Wed, 10 Jul 1996 22:26:58 +0800) - Re: more about the usefulness of PGP - bryce@digicash.com
      • 1996-07-10 (Thu, 11 Jul 1996 04:40:30 +0800) - Re: more about the usefulness of PGP - Derek Atkins <warlord@MIT.EDU>