1996-07-13 - Re: Need PGP-awareness in common utilities

Header Data

From: bryce@digicash.com
To: Remo Pini <rp@rpini.com>
Message Hash: 27577b1861d77673337ccddbdac24cbc24a8bfc7b94239d3ee054083ad4d9c7f
Message ID: <199607121616.SAA04183@digicash.com>
Reply To: <1.5.4.32.19960712133842.008c3308@193.246.3.200>
UTC Datetime: 1996-07-13 00:02:25 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 13 Jul 1996 08:02:25 +0800

Raw message

From: bryce@digicash.com
Date: Sat, 13 Jul 1996 08:02:25 +0800
To: Remo Pini <rp@rpini.com>
Subject: Re: Need PGP-awareness in common utilities
In-Reply-To: <1.5.4.32.19960712133842.008c3308@193.246.3.200>
Message-ID: <199607121616.SAA04183@digicash.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

I, Bryce wrote:
>
> Which is where the small payments to ratings producers from
> ratings consumers comes in.  Again this is just the
> quantification of a phenomena that we all take for granted.
> (Namely, that people who produce quality ratings are producing a
> value and trading/contributing it to others.)


Remo Pini <rp@rpini.com> wrote:
> 
> It sure sounds like I'll have to pay, so someone decides for me, wether some
> piece of info is important to me.


Key phrase here is "have to " as opposed to "choose to".  (Just 
like always...)


> Now, if that isn't the first step to censorship!


It's not.


One good way to get started on the road to censorship is to 
believe that everyone has a right to the means of publication.


Regards,

Bryce




-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2i
Comment: Auto-signed under Unix with 'BAP' Easy-PGP v1.1b2

iQB1AwUBMeZ6c0jbHy8sKZitAQHZagMAg0nRknUZDn0m5y57xJPKAMTygF5NRXZq
nkR7Ad5R2SYiHN5OPIsPQOtR2NNPEnjPL0PKjMtDvF4OkKZ/OTt3pQKE1dUN7Q8Y
FhHk9uSU7aSWqIaN4hItU0B1B1BeJSgJ
=jUlr
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----





Thread