1996-07-28 - Security debate after Olympics bombing

Header Data

From: “E. ALLEN SMITH” <EALLENSMITH@ocelot.Rutgers.EDU>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 32bb2144ad41e4707a89d6cc010e2e93e6661e34e13535c9050e8de45530563d
Message ID: <01I7LFV08TDW9EDGT3@mbcl.rutgers.edu>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-07-28 13:02:27 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 28 Jul 1996 21:02:27 +0800

Raw message

From: "E. ALLEN SMITH" <EALLENSMITH@ocelot.Rutgers.EDU>
Date: Sun, 28 Jul 1996 21:02:27 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Security debate after Olympics bombing
Message-ID: <01I7LFV08TDW9EDGT3@mbcl.rutgers.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


	Well, at least some people have the right idea.
	-Allen

>Experts point out differences in Atlanta, TWA incidents

>   _(c) Copyright Nando.net_
   
>    The Associated Press
    
>   WASHINGTON -- With nerves already on edge after the suspicious downing
>   of TWA Flight 800, the bombing at the Olympic Games in Atlanta on
>   Saturday renewed concerns about U.S. safeguards against terrorism.
   
>   But analyses by security experts drew important distinctions between
>   the incidents, and politicians cautioned against measures that would
>   limit liberties.
   
>   Investigators have not officially determined what caused the Flight
>   800 tragedy, but if the jetliner was brought down by terrorists it was
>   a relatively sophisticated operation.
   
>   By comparison, the device in Atlanta was easy to make and detonated in
>   an easily accessible place. "I don't believe that a pipe bomb would
>   have taken down that TWA plane," said a Treasury agent, who requested
   anonymity.
   
>   Another federal investigator noted differences between the Atlanta
>   attack and Middle Eastern terrorists who often use high-powered truck
>   bombs. And domestic militia groups tend to focus on government
>   buildings, not crowds.
   
>   James Alan Fox, the dean of Northeastern University's criminal justice
>   school and a student of criminal behavior, said there are basically
>   two motivations for bombers: revenge and attention.
   
>   "The desire to make a statement can be that of a well-organized
>   terrorist group that uses the victims as pawns to advance their cause,
>   or it could be someone who is just interested in feeling important,"
>   he said.
   
>   Given the recent rise of violent anti-government groups, Fox
>   speculated that a militia sympathizer might use such an event to grab
>   the spotlight.
   
>   "Through an amateurish bombing like this, he can feel like he's part
>   of the movement," Fox said. "He can elevate his sense of importance."
   
[...]
  
>   And building one is almost as simple. "If you don't know how to do it,
>   there are any number of books available ... that will teach you
>   explicitly, step-by-step, how to manufacture the device," Vitch said.
   
[...]

>   House Speaker Newt Gingrich stressed that security was already high at
>   the Olympics, and cautioned against adopting a "police state"
>   mentality.
   
>   "If a terrorist is nutty enough, there's always an opportunity for
>   tragedy," he said, appearing after Nunn on CNN. "A free people can't
>   back down."





Thread