1996-07-23 - Re: Bare fibers
Header Data
From: “Douglas R. Floyd” <dfloyd@IO.COM>
To: harka@nycmetro.com
Message Hash: 371330c8ada42b24b62c6b9224018c76571b0ba4485d27fad4aabbc962858a5c
Message ID: <199607230530.AAA29271@pentagon.io.com>
Reply To: <TCPSMTP.16.7.22.-16.21.10.2780269260.1201367@nycmetro.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-07-23 08:35:40 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 23 Jul 1996 16:35:40 +0800
Raw message
From: "Douglas R. Floyd" <dfloyd@IO.COM>
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 1996 16:35:40 +0800
To: harka@nycmetro.com
Subject: Re: Bare fibers
In-Reply-To: <TCPSMTP.16.7.22.-16.21.10.2780269260.1201367@nycmetro.com>
Message-ID: <199607230530.AAA29271@pentagon.io.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
>
> * Carbons sent to: In: jimbell@pacifier.com
>
> -=> Quoting In:jimbell@pacifier.com to Harka <=-
>
> In> The fiber is usually coated with a very thin layer of clear plastic to
> In> protect against moisture and abrasion, and the diameter is around 0.5
> In> to 1.0 millimeters in diameter.
>
>
> Doesn't that make it vulnerable (detectable) to Tempest attacks?
Not really sure how. I have had heard of ways to tap a fibre optic link
noninvasively, but its not related to Van Eck or anything like that.
>
> Harka
> ___ Blue Wave/386 v2.30 [NR]
>
>
Thread
Return to July 1996
- Return to ““Douglas R. Floyd” <dfloyd@IO.COM>”
- Return to “harka@nycmetro.com”
Return to “Rabid Wombat <wombat@mcfeely.bsfs.org>”
- 1996-07-23 (Tue, 23 Jul 1996 11:34:40 +0800) - Re: Bare fibers - harka@nycmetro.com
- 1996-07-23 (Tue, 23 Jul 1996 16:35:40 +0800) - Re: Bare fibers - “Douglas R. Floyd” <dfloyd@IO.COM>
- 1996-07-23 (Wed, 24 Jul 1996 05:58:16 +0800) - Re: Bare fibers - Rabid Wombat <wombat@mcfeely.bsfs.org>