1996-07-25 - FW: Distributed DES crack

Header Data

From: “geeman@best.com” <geeman@best.com>
To: “‘Cypherpunks@toad.com>
Message Hash: 4e7f72914959da28803f6e69621725a5ff4331b662438ddc9214d71eaeb337bf
Message ID: <01BB79AB.20FDE7E0@geeman.vip.best.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-07-25 06:42:41 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 25 Jul 1996 14:42:41 +0800

Raw message

From: "geeman@best.com" <geeman@best.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 1996 14:42:41 +0800
To: "'Cypherpunks@toad.com>
Subject: FW: Distributed DES crack
Message-ID: <01BB79AB.20FDE7E0@geeman.vip.best.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



----------
From: 	Remo Pini[SMTP:rp@rpini.com]
Sent: 	Wednesday, July 24, 1996 7:34 AM
To: 	cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: 	Re: Distributed DES crack

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Date: Wed Jul 24 16:31:44 1996

Has anyone thought about TI or Motorolas DSP-Eval-Boards (at 99$ a piece at 
40 MHz with optimized assembler they might easily outrun a PPro200)
Don't look at me that way, I know only little about DSP-Programming.

>>> DSP's are optimized for add/multiply ... and you get their 
memory-access pipelining; but I am not too sure how they'd do on a DES 
algo.  I wouldn't get too excited.







Thread