1996-07-18 - Re: Surf-filter lists

Header Data

From: declan@well.com (Declan McCullagh)
To: “Robert A. Hayden” <hayden@krypton.mankato.msus.edu>
Message Hash: 5ec0469065c9c9bcbd7b4733c3898d48d0ced842f71bfc6b4f22ccb00dd5c669
Message ID: <v0151010fae12ffcf3eae@[204.62.128.229]>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-07-18 07:49:56 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 18 Jul 1996 15:49:56 +0800

Raw message

From: declan@well.com (Declan McCullagh)
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 1996 15:49:56 +0800
To: "Robert A. Hayden" <hayden@krypton.mankato.msus.edu>
Subject: Re: Surf-filter lists
Message-ID: <v0151010fae12ffcf3eae@[204.62.128.229]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Fine, call it "blocking," "restricting access to," or "muzzling." My point
still stands.

-Declan


>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>
>On Tue, 16 Jul 1996, Declan McCullagh wrote:
>
>> More to the point, as I wrote at the end of the original CWD, it's a
>> bait-and-switch maneuver. Go after porn, they say, but the censor political
>> information.
>
>ARGH!  I've been keeping quiet about this for a while, but I thing I
>gotta say something before I throttle my Zip drive...
>
><rant>A Private organization cannot "censor" anything.  The fundamental
>definition of the word require some agent of the government take action
>to censor.  To accuse Surf-Watch, net-nanny, AOL, MSU, AT&T, or whatever
>of "censorship" accomplishes nothing except to make us look the
>fool.</rant>
>
>I agree that the problem with the "bait-and-switch" filtering of net
>materials by these various filtering packages needs to be addressed.  If I
>want to protect my kids from seeing alt.naughty.pictures, I shoudl still
>be able to unfilter political and health speech.  The real problem isn't
>censorship, it's disclosure by the makers of filtering packages about
>what exactly their packages are going to filter for me and my family.
>However, in the upcoming war of filtering packages (and it will get ugly)
>trade secrets are going to make any company hesitant to reveal what it is
>they are filtering and what criteria they are using to determine if
>something qualifies.
>
>
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>Version: 2.6.2
>Comment: PGP Signed with PineSign 2.2
>
>iQCVAwUBMe0jezokqlyVGmCFAQH0SAP+ONXs2f4GxjIrC6cp2sc9CgTrebL4cBWB
>UqpH4H3UO0TiKZN4T6MGVC6kCA3OwQnd0DNC0f0D6+iZTPkwN228Am6ZH4+t9hZs
>OrmCbZCiWZipLfT1gphIHqFHSqIQ506LkkGgLK0gjsS2ahrI+cNYJA3yYBviMkB1
>zuj1KRJ+pMk=
>=ddI5
>-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>____           Robert A. Hayden      <=> hayden@krypton.mankato.msus.edu
>\  /__     Finger for Geek Code Info <=>    Finger for PGP Public Key
> \/  /           -=-=-=-=-=-                      -=-=-=-=-=-
>   \/        http://krypton.mankato.msus.edu/~hayden/Welcome.html
>
>-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
>Version: 3.12
>GED/J d-- s:++>: a- C++(++++)$ ULUO++ P+>+++ L++ !E---- W+(---) N+++ o+
>K+++ w+(---) O- M+$>++ V-- PS++(+++)>$ PE++(+)>$ Y++ PGP++ t- 5+++ X++
>R+++>$ tv+ b+ DI+++ D+++ G+++++>$ e++$>++++ h r-- y+**
>------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------







Thread