1996-07-21 - Re: CDT Policy Post 2.28 - FBI Director to Testify at Senate Crypto Hearing

Header Data

From: jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
To: Bob Palacios <cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 7ab5f686dfe22fe8b9fb65b4acddf0446fdd4ca5933a8acb0a9755160d052a6c
Message ID: <199607212127.OAA10799@mail.pacifier.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-07-21 23:42:27 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 22 Jul 1996 07:42:27 +0800

Raw message

From: jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 1996 07:42:27 +0800
To: Bob Palacios <cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: CDT Policy Post 2.28 - FBI Director to Testify at Senate Crypto Hearing
Message-ID: <199607212127.OAA10799@mail.pacifier.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


At 02:12 PM 7/21/96 -0400, Bob Palacios wrote:
>   The Center for Democracy and Technology  /____/     Volume 2, Number 28
 POLICY POST Volume 2, Number 28                        July 21, 1996
> CONTENTS: (1) FBI Director to Testify at Senate Crypto Hearing; Netizens Can
>               Participate in Hearing Live Online
>In an effort to ensure that concerned Internet users can participate in
>this important policy debate,

If there is anything worth complaining about, it is that there simply hasn't 
been a "debate" in this "important policy debate."  The pro-GAK few have 
consistently avoided appearing in a format in which a genuine debate can 
occur.  And I don't mean a question-and-answer scenario either, whether the 
questions are asked by Congress or the news media.  I'm talking about a REAL 
debate, one where the pro-GAK's can be seen to _lose_ by being torn to pieces.

Jim Bell
jimbell@pacifier.com





Thread