1996-07-18 - Re: Opiated file systems

Header Data

From: tcmay@got.net (Timothy C. May)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 7edc820baef13108958b7a0c4a31eafbcbbb4fb10b92cbe0222ae6ed166ca0e9
Message ID: <ae13d749190210044435@[205.199.118.202]>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-07-18 23:38:54 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 19 Jul 1996 07:38:54 +0800

Raw message

From: tcmay@got.net (Timothy C. May)
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 1996 07:38:54 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Opiated file systems
Message-ID: <ae13d749190210044435@[205.199.118.202]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


At 8:05 AM 7/18/96, jim bell wrote:

>It has long occurred to me, considering the size and low power of the
>typical 3.5" hard drive compared with the size of the typical house or
>apartment, that it might be an interesting project to remotely connect such
>a (hidden) drive to your computer using a reasonably surreptious link that
>is difficult to trace.  Say, an IR optical link, a single bare (unjacketed)
>optical fiber, a LAN with hidden nodes, or a similar system.  Maybe an
>inductive pickup.  In any raid, they'll have to decide what to take, and
>chances are very good that they won't find every hidden item.

I think the druggies call this a "rat line": two apartments next to each
other, with the humans living in one and the drugs stored in the other. The
drugs are gotten through a hole in the wall.

(Hey, I'm not saying it works, or that it stops raids, prosecutions,
convictions, etc. Just noting the existence.)

Any multi-unit apartment can do this already, with data. The hard disk can
be upstairs and two units away, connected with Ethernet (as many apartment
buildings out here in California already are), or whatever. Any raid on
Unit 3B, for example, finds that no files are stored locally. A separate
investigation and/or search warrant for whereever the files actually are
stored would be of course problematic and/or delayed.

(Friends of mine have worked on "remote storage" ideas for exactly such
applications. Clearly there are many options: storage in other local sites,
storage in offshore sites, encrypted storage, even storage by a "priest"
functionary ("Son, I am ready to receive your digitally transmitted
confession.").)

Lots of possibilities. For various reasons, few have been pursued. (Mostly
because, I think, there have been relatively few raids on data, and when
there have been raids, there were usually other HUMINT-type factors
involved. E.g., few child porn rings are going to be broken only on the
basis of seized disks. As this situation changes, expect more "data
archival" services to evolve.)

--Tim May

Boycott "Big Brother Inside" software!
We got computers, we're tapping phone lines, we know that that ain't allowed.
---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:----
Timothy C. May              | Crypto Anarchy: encryption, digital money,
tcmay@got.net  408-728-0152 | anonymous networks, digital pseudonyms, zero
W.A.S.T.E.: Corralitos, CA  | knowledge, reputations, information markets,
Licensed Ontologist         | black markets, collapse of governments.
"National borders aren't even speed bumps on the information superhighway."









Thread