1996-07-11 - Re: Word lists for passphrases > Apologies

Header Data

From: Erle Greer <erleg@sdinter.net>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: cb3163118314e953845626350e418cd3cfc6913d757f4e7e106b8f2716e6b733
Message ID: <2.2.32.19960710220552.006aa224@pop3.sdinter.net>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-07-11 02:22:33 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 11 Jul 1996 10:22:33 +0800

Raw message

From: Erle Greer <erleg@sdinter.net>
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 1996 10:22:33 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Word lists for passphrases > Apologies
Message-ID: <2.2.32.19960710220552.006aa224@pop3.sdinter.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


My apologies if you thought that I was pinpointing you, Mark, as an
individual.  You actually did a good job of proving to Ben that his example
words were useless in his argument.  One should gather actual data before
making statements.  God knows everyone else will evaluate data ten-times
more than the poster will.  I was merely trying to state that negative
comments (that have no direction or obvious support of the conversation) are
not in the interest of the entire group.  At most, they should be considered
private and voiced via email.






Thread