1996-07-30 - Re: Denning vs. Gilmore

Header Data

From: Marshall Clow <mclow@owl.csusm.edu>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: d4fba419ddbdc97b4c838c3601db9979e3a6bdf9d336845dd99dda9b57887334
Message ID: <v03007805ae23eec15086@[207.67.246.99]>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-07-30 21:29:48 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 31 Jul 1996 05:29:48 +0800

Raw message

From: Marshall Clow <mclow@owl.csusm.edu>
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 1996 05:29:48 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Denning vs. Gilmore
Message-ID: <v03007805ae23eec15086@[207.67.246.99]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


>Today, Monday, July 29, Dorothy Denning begins her debate vs. John Gilmore
>over The Absolute Right to Privacy on Wired Online's Brain Tennis site. Do
>citizens of the world have an "unalienable right" to privacy - or are there
>reasons why governments ought to have access to our communications? This
>debate will run daily through August 7. Follow along at
>http://www.wired.com/braintennis/
>
I especially like Dr. Denning's quote:

>An encrypted global information infrastructure is without precedent in
>world history. It allows individuals and groups, anywhere and any time,
>to communicate securely and with total privacy across time and space.

Now _there_ is a goal to shoot for!


Minor comments:

First, a historical question:
	What percentage of telegraph traffic was encrypted in the 1910s?

A global information infrastructure (encrypted or not) is without precedent in world history, is it not?

I noticed that she said "allows", not "would allow". That contradicts
<<I'm not ready to accept "the cat is out of the bag.">>, doesn't it?

-- Marshall

Marshall Clow     Aladdin Systems   <mailto:mclow@mailhost2.csusm.edu>

"We're not gonna take it/Never did and never will
We're not gonna take it/Gonna break it, gonna shake it,
let's forget it better still" -- The Who, "Tommy"







Thread