1996-07-19 - Netscrape download

Header Data

From: David Lesher <wb8foz@nrk.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com (Cypherpunks)
Message Hash: d53351311c29a3cc38045b206e92a69a200572db412277d125f23398ad179470
Message ID: <199607190151.VAA14421@nrk.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-07-19 05:38:04 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 19 Jul 1996 13:38:04 +0800

Raw message

From: David Lesher <wb8foz@nrk.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 1996 13:38:04 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com (Cypherpunks)
Subject: Netscrape download
Message-ID: <199607190151.VAA14421@nrk.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text





[From Phil Karn]


Netscape's use of a CGI interface to download the US version
(128-bit key) of Netscape Navigator raises the possibility
that they are "serializing" or "personalizing" each copy they
send out, perhaps in response to a DoS request that they do so
in order to trace unauthorized redistribution.

One way to test this theory without redistributing the actual
code is to compare MD5 hashes of the distributions. After two
days of unsuccessful attempts at obtaining the code from their
overloaded server, I've just successfully downloaded the SunOS,
BSDI and Windows 95 versions of Netscape Navigator. Here are the
MD5 hashes of the files I received:

BSDI version:
4ec4a705e2e4c6560475852fae807c8c

SunOS version:
e72ff352ca7c619cb31b8f8ef3651b28

Windows 95 version:
8e936813f12a1b3b77ed03d9239ebd5d

Anybody care to compare these to the copies they obtain, assuming
the logjam on the server breaks sometime soon?

Phil

-- 
A host is a host from coast to coast.................wb8foz@nrk.com
& no one will talk to a host that's close...........(v)301 56 LINUX
Unless the host (that isn't close).........................pob 1433
is busy, hung or dead........vr vr vr vr.................20915-1433





Thread