1996-07-14 - Re: CDT Policy Post 2.27 - No New News on Crypto: Gore Restates Suppor
Header Data
From: Yap Remailer <remailer@yap.pactitle.com> x@x.x
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: dca85310efc763078734ebcd162f06ef523a873d622d368d771605d0d3655c2d
Message ID: <199607140215.TAA25137@yap.pactitle.com>
Reply To: <v02140b1bae0c80b15a2e@[204.157.127.16]>
UTC Datetime: 1996-07-14 05:42:58 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 14 Jul 1996 13:42:58 +0800
Raw message
From: Yap Remailer <remailer@yap.pactitle.com> x@x.x
Date: Sun, 14 Jul 1996 13:42:58 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: CDT Policy Post 2.27 - No New News on Crypto: Gore Restates Suppor
In-Reply-To: <v02140b1bae0c80b15a2e@[204.157.127.16]>
Message-ID: <199607140215.TAA25137@yap.pactitle.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Can someone explain what, if any, effect this might have on domestic
use of encryption? When they say relaxing export restrictions in
exchange for escrow, that still just means escrow for exportable
products (which they are hoping will be almost everything), right?
Is there any danger of domestic encryption without escrow being
outlawed?
Thanks.
Thread
Return to July 1996
- Return to “editor@cdt.org (Bob Palacios)”
Return to “Yap Remailer <remailer@yap.pactitle.com> x@x.x”
- 1996-07-13 (Sat, 13 Jul 1996 14:42:58 +0800) - CDT Policy Post 2.27 - No New News on Crypto: Gore Restates Support for Key Escrow - editor@cdt.org (Bob Palacios)
- 1996-07-14 (Sun, 14 Jul 1996 13:42:58 +0800) - Re: CDT Policy Post 2.27 - No New News on Crypto: Gore Restates Suppor - Yap Remailer <remailer@yap.pactitle.com> x@x.x