From: Sherry Mayo <scmayo@rschp2.anu.edu.au>
Date: Fri, 5 Jul 1996 14:14:17 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re:What remains to be done: keeping info free
Message-ID: <199607050336.UAA07204@toad.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Hal Finney writes.. 
> From: Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>
> > A.  Methods to run secure websites on insecure servers.
> > [...]
> > A software solution which permits local decryption makes traffic analysis
> > less useful, presents the opportunity to use front end and disposable www
> > pages on domestic ISPs while imposing no liability on the ISP itself, and
> > opens several more effective traffic analysis deterants.

> I don't quite understand what is being proposed here.  If the
> information on the web site is encrypted, who is supposed to be able to
> decrypt it?  Just one person, or some select group of people?  My

If the objective is to keep information available 
then check out Ross Andersons "eternity service" proposal 
(http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk:80/users/rja14/#Lib)
which outlines a "highly distributed, resilient and anonymous file store.
Once a document is published on it, the courts will simply not be able 
to find and delete all the copies"

Sherry


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6

iQCVAgUBMdyPeOFu4n6w1qeBAQF4igP/bhD22woqB8W2kglF6r6Z4rdUVDzGrXk4
N9Iav/KnUtAlmWb/yItHg9+uwAPRtomkTeOZye5UcmJzYI8WERyBYi5Y4OghA48a
vo9C/Qo4znljc2J3+J1nWuuDp1khSVB/b+B1/r2zqN/Uv7YvwkF9cext/bf8XV/G
uxPJz0DvSLE=
=jiix
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----