1996-07-25 - Re: Netscape

Header Data

From: David Sternlight <david@sternlight.com>
To: The Deviant <jimbell@pacifier.com>
Message Hash: ed9aac19493d192b8ad6578a48bcfc23b292fdab6f0a2ed27bcfc6cb858e2cab
Message ID: <v03007805ae1c7565dfa7@[192.187.162.15]>
Reply To: <199607241752.KAA02103@mail.pacifier.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-07-25 03:12:18 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 25 Jul 1996 11:12:18 +0800

Raw message

From: David Sternlight <david@sternlight.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 1996 11:12:18 +0800
To: The Deviant <jimbell@pacifier.com>
Subject: Re: Netscape
In-Reply-To: <199607241752.KAA02103@mail.pacifier.com>
Message-ID: <v03007805ae1c7565dfa7@[192.187.162.15]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


At 11:37 AM -0700 7/24/96, The Deviant wrote:

>(just so you'll
>know, RSA's FTP basicly has a readme file that says "the files in subdir
>of a dir thats -r+x to you, so if you're a citizen go to
>dist/usaRANDOM_NUMBER_HERE", thats it).  Then make them explain why
>Netscape should be any different.

I don't KNOW, but a reasonable speculation is because Netscape is a
complete operating package and RSAREF is a set of subroutines or (in the
case of MIT PGP, a pre/post processor). If, as I have often speculated, the
objective is to keep mass market software with strong crypto out of foreign
hands (and Netscape certainly qualifies given the number of copies out
there), then one would expect more stringent rules for it, the Microsoft
browser (when IT gets strong crypto), Lotus Notes, etc.

David








Thread