1996-07-11 - RE: FW: MSoft crypto API’s

Header Data

From: “Deranged Mutant” <WlkngOwl@unix.asb.com>
To: “geeman@best.com>
Message Hash: f62fa4233a7af7374eb9f469491afae22a6f3a7dbeb9c4eb377947c9d448f99f
Message ID: <199607102218.SAA10675@unix.asb.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-07-11 03:56:27 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 11 Jul 1996 11:56:27 +0800

Raw message

From: "Deranged Mutant" <WlkngOwl@unix.asb.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 1996 11:56:27 +0800
To: "geeman@best.com>
Subject: RE: FW: MSoft crypto API's
Message-ID: <199607102218.SAA10675@unix.asb.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


On 10 Jul 96 at 8:56, geeman@best.com wrote:

> but they don't sign the drivers.  they sign the CSP.  only.
 drivers are (can be) shipped as totally separate pieces of code.

You missed my point.  The crypto-service program they sign might be a 
DES library.  One implementation would be entirely in software; 
another would be a front-end interface with hardware (essentially a 
driver), perhaps as part of the kernel [Admittedly I'll have to 
re-read MS's specs].

So say you're a manufactuer or DES hardware... you sure would like to 
get that covetted 'Win95' logo on your package if you want to go 
mainstream.

Rob





---
No-frills sig.
Befriend my mail filter by sending a message with the subject "send help"
Key-ID: 5D3F2E99 1996/04/22 wlkngowl@unix.asb.com (root@magneto)
        AB1F4831 1993/05/10 Deranged Mutant <wlkngowl@unix.asb.com>
Send a message with the subject "send pgp-key" for a copy of my key.





Thread