1996-07-19 - Re: (fwd) Re: US versions of Netscape now available—NOT

Header Data

From: Adam Shostack <adam@homeport.org>
To: david@sternlight.com (David Sternlight)
Message Hash: fd8262d7c3d530e98b88be88c144e5686274709ced7f7dacda17bdd157ff5074
Message ID: <199607190206.VAA11239@homeport.org>
Reply To: <v03007603ae14223a6068@[192.187.162.15]>
UTC Datetime: 1996-07-19 05:18:20 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 19 Jul 1996 13:18:20 +0800

Raw message

From: Adam Shostack <adam@homeport.org>
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 1996 13:18:20 +0800
To: david@sternlight.com (David Sternlight)
Subject: Re: (fwd) Re: US versions of Netscape now available---NOT
In-Reply-To: <v03007603ae14223a6068@[192.187.162.15]>
Message-ID: <199607190206.VAA11239@homeport.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text


David Sternlight wrote:

| >   Whatever YaKnow
| >   cybernut@nutcom.com
| >   10401 Wilshire Blvd, Suite 805
| >   Los Angeles, CA 90024-4628
| >   (310) 475-3799

| >Your friend.
| 
| Isn't that nice. Some creep is proud enough of his skill at accessing the
| trivially available InterNIC finger data that he posts it to invoke
| harassment. And being a coward as well, he hides behind an anonymous
| remailer.

	I see nothing cowardly about opposing a bad law from where the
Feds can't harrass you.  If the Feds were 'moral and upright' about
enforcing the ITARs, instead of keeping Phil under indictment until
the last minute, harrassing MIT via Sandia National Labs, and refusing
to make clear the laws under which we live, then you might call it
cowardly to oppose the law from behind a shield of anonymity.
However, the Feds don't play by any set of rules known to the public.

Adam

-- 
"It is seldom that liberty of any kind is lost all at once."
					               -Hume






Thread