1996-08-23 - Re: Spamming (Good or Bad?)

Header Data

From: Vipul Ved Prakash <vipul@pobox.com>
To: bdavis@thepoint.net (Brian Davis)
Message Hash: 32b30dc425a5f92f68e1a86228bf557814afe302db4b2abd37c69df60f003b0b
Message ID: <199608230336.DAA00609@fountainhead.net>
Reply To: <Pine.BSF.3.91.960821150339.9917H-100000@mercury.thepoint.net>
UTC Datetime: 1996-08-23 10:48:42 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 23 Aug 1996 18:48:42 +0800

Raw message

From: Vipul Ved Prakash <vipul@pobox.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Aug 1996 18:48:42 +0800
To: bdavis@thepoint.net (Brian Davis)
Subject: Re: Spamming (Good or Bad?)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.91.960821150339.9917H-100000@mercury.thepoint.net>
Message-ID: <199608230336.DAA00609@fountainhead.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text


> Free (commercial)speech for you (perhaps at our expense), but no free 
> speech for us?

This is peculiar. Nobody seems to mind ads in Newspapers, printed magazines, TV, and for that matter
web sites. That is unwanted stuff too, but now someone is paying for it. Though one can argue it out, on
many grounds :

1. If the guy has to pay for it, he'll do it in limits.
2. He must have selected the context carefully, so the ad is most prolly of 
   some use to its audience
3. He'll tend to talk sense.

 
- Vipul







Thread