1996-08-10 - Re: Why should we trust the system?

Header Data

From: jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
To: jonathon <grafolog@netcom.com>
Message Hash: 4868f7c84b552a47bd26c0123e23d008c69af887c903c15020e636e4ddaa8828
Message ID: <199608100120.SAA02197@mail.pacifier.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-08-10 05:11:18 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 10 Aug 1996 13:11:18 +0800

Raw message

From: jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
Date: Sat, 10 Aug 1996 13:11:18 +0800
To: jonathon <grafolog@netcom.com>
Subject: Re: Why should we trust the system?
Message-ID: <199608100120.SAA02197@mail.pacifier.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


At 07:10 AM 8/9/96 +0000, jonathon wrote:
>On Thu, 8 Aug 1996, jim bell wrote:
>
>> Okay, I'll admit that I _never_ believed that judges actually follow the 
>> standards they claim to.  But many other people of those who are more 
>
>	I know of a very good way to ensure that judges do follow
>	the standards that they claim to follow.
>
>	It works even better at making politicians keep all the
>	election promises the make.
>
>	Has one drawback --- it reduces the number of people willing
>	to carry out those two functions to virtually zero.  OTOH, that
>	probably would be a very good thing.  
>

That's odd...I know of one also!    B^)


Jim Bell
jimbell@pacifier.com





Thread