1996-08-28 - Re: A REALLY Interesting Bet

Header Data

From: Gary Howland <gary@systemics.com>
To: Anonymous <nobody@zifi.genetics.utah.edu>
Message Hash: 668d8d9c1459cdf9c1be7f28c521d699cc2e8d5bc1237dd95a79b9c48cee21b7
Message ID: <32246E57.7D55368C@systemics.com>
Reply To: <199608272002.OAA27298@zifi.genetics.utah.edu>
UTC Datetime: 1996-08-28 19:45:51 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 29 Aug 1996 03:45:51 +0800

Raw message

From: Gary Howland <gary@systemics.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 1996 03:45:51 +0800
To: Anonymous <nobody@zifi.genetics.utah.edu>
Subject: Re: A _REALLY_ Interesting Bet
In-Reply-To: <199608272002.OAA27298@zifi.genetics.utah.edu>
Message-ID: <32246E57.7D55368C@systemics.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Anonymous wrote:
> 
> Betting on football is one thing, but some of us would be very
> interested in the odds on US presidential election outcomes as
> November approaches. This kind of betting is illegal here, and
> I haven't looked lately for a "Ladbroke's" type site, but it is
> interesting because the betting odds from across the Atlantic
> more closely match eventual election results than the annoying
> calls from Gallup & Roper during suppertime. I have posted here,
> anonymously, on this topic before, but some of you are aware of
> who I am. I'll thank you to keep that a secret. ;}

Thinking about this some more - what would people want to see in such a
betting system.  Would you be happy with two choices?:

	(Clinton/Dole) or Other

or three choices?:

	Clinton, Dole or Other

or would you want more choices than this?  I'm asking, since we've been
tossing around this presidential election idea for a few days now, but
since we're not Americans, we're not too sure what is a suitable set
(bearing in mind that our idea for this will get more difficult as the
number of choices increases).

Gary
--
pub  1024/C001D00D 1996/01/22  Gary Howland <gary@systemics.com>
Key fingerprint =  0C FB 60 61 4D 3B 24 7D  1C 89 1D BE 1F EE 09 06





Thread