1996-08-20 - Re: Taxes on Internet access prediction

Header Data

From: tcmay@got.net (Timothy C. May)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 6bf28a572fee739ec57c6b7159974cf15254f8cff158691bc819865fccdb9e65
Message ID: <ae3f3913000210049dc3@[205.199.118.202]>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-08-20 21:45:14 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 21 Aug 1996 05:45:14 +0800

Raw message

From: tcmay@got.net (Timothy C. May)
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 1996 05:45:14 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Taxes on Internet access prediction
Message-ID: <ae3f3913000210049dc3@[205.199.118.202]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


At 4:07 AM 8/20/96, Mike McNally wrote:
>States and municipalities are taxing internet access.  Who wants to
>make a prediction about if/when the IRS will start to count net access
>as a taxable fringe benefit of employment?
>
>(At a small company where I once worked, a tax accountant visiting
>one day noticed that we had a weight bench set up in a back corner of
>the big "back room".  He advised us to be careful, because the IRS
>could count that as a taxable employee benefit.)

I think the test of whether something is a "perq" (or is it "perk"?), and
thus possibly taxable to the employee, is whether it is outside the normal
bounds of work. Thus, one's office cubicle, computer, office supplies,
etc., are not taxable fringe benefits.

Membership in a country club is, though.

Net access, if primarily used for work-related things, would not be. Just
as company phone calls are not treated as a fringe benefit for the
employees making the phone calls. Or business trips. And so on.

At least one community has tried to treat _parking places_ (and I don't
mean special, tree-shaded, reserved, V.I.P. parking places) as taxable
benefits. This is to try to get more people to car-pool, or telecommute, or
somesuch. Howls of protest pretty much drove this idea back into the hole
from whence it came.

Many of my Intel friends have Net accounts, obviously, and yet the number
of posts on the Usenet or elsewhere from "*.intel.com" are relatively low.
I asked a couple of friends of mine about this, and they confirmed that
Intel management has discouraged public postings and comments from
*.intel.com domain accounts. Understandable, for reasons I have discussed
many times. Many employees of companies find it easier to purchase their
own account from Netcom, Earthlink, Best, etc., and so have a Net name
unaffiliated with their employer.

--Tim May

Boycott "Big Brother Inside" software!
We got computers, we're tapping phone lines, we know that that ain't allowed.
---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:----
Timothy C. May              | Crypto Anarchy: encryption, digital money,
tcmay@got.net  408-728-0152 | anonymous networks, digital pseudonyms, zero
W.A.S.T.E.: Corralitos, CA  | knowledge, reputations, information markets,
Licensed Ontologist         | black markets, collapse of governments.
"National borders aren't even speed bumps on the information superhighway."









Thread