1996-08-14 - Re: non-secure network utilities - pointers?

Header Data

From: “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>
To: Sam Quigley <poodge@econ.berkeley.edu>
Message Hash: 75287a564352fa1d0d08969c80242e41bb0c6c0425c65df5a53de881a2f6c076
Message ID: <199608141527.LAA21142@jekyll.piermont.com>
Reply To: <Pine.SUN.3.91.960813010527.1025D-100000@quesnay.Berkeley.EDU>
UTC Datetime: 1996-08-14 18:57:31 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 15 Aug 1996 02:57:31 +0800

Raw message

From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 1996 02:57:31 +0800
To: Sam Quigley <poodge@econ.berkeley.edu>
Subject: Re: non-secure network utilities - pointers?
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SUN.3.91.960813010527.1025D-100000@quesnay.Berkeley.EDU>
Message-ID: <199608141527.LAA21142@jekyll.piermont.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



Sam Quigley writes:
> What cypherpunk-approved (tm) -- that is, cryptographically strong, 
> freely available, and well-implemented (reliable) -- network utilities are 
> available?  I'm willing to agree to US-only license agreement iff I have 
> to...


Try SSH and friends -- they are a pretty good thing.

http://www.ssh.fi/, I believe.

Perry





Thread