1996-08-21 - Re: Spamming

Header Data

From: “Alex F” <alexf@iss.net>
To: jims@MPGN.COM>
Message Hash: 79ed15f7db429945c44c3827c512047f7c1cf8df4b3e81bbd2dc9b9786a9ec68
Message ID: <199608211955.PAA01059@phoenix.iss.net>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-08-21 23:56:51 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 22 Aug 1996 07:56:51 +0800

Raw message

From: "Alex F" <alexf@iss.net>
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 1996 07:56:51 +0800
To: jims@MPGN.COM>
Subject: Re: Spamming
Message-ID: <199608211955.PAA01059@phoenix.iss.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


> At 06:09 PM 8/20/96 -0700, Rich Graves wrote:
> >On Wed, 21 Aug 1996, Vipul Ved Prakash wrote:
> >
> >> I don't know if there has been much discussion on the ethics of spamming
> >> here? Is spamming free speech? 
> >
> >Yes.
> 
> No. 

[snip]

Freedom of Speech includes freedom FROM speech.  IOW, if it starts 
infringing on your rights, then it stops.  Spam is unsolicited, 
commercial email, and it could possibly be argued that just as the 
spammer has the right to say whatever it is that he wants, we also 
have the right not to get his email.  This can also get very 
convoluted.

Besides that, it's just impolite.

Alex F
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Alex F    alexf@iss.net
Marketing Specialist
Internet Security Systems
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-





Thread