1996-08-09 - Re: Oregon License Plate Site in the News Tonight!

Header Data

From: Rich Graves <rich@c2.org>
To: “John F. Fricker” <jfricker@vertexgroup.com>
Message Hash: 853400ada02381fc5cae0747f9f646819a6fedbbdd6cae41d6a1874e495bc32a
Message ID: <Pine.GUL.3.95.960808172010.7089C-100000@Networking.Stanford.EDU>
Reply To: <2.2.32.19960808234932.00902f58@vertexgroup.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-08-09 03:09:28 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 9 Aug 1996 11:09:28 +0800

Raw message

From: Rich Graves <rich@c2.org>
Date: Fri, 9 Aug 1996 11:09:28 +0800
To: "John F. Fricker" <jfricker@vertexgroup.com>
Subject: Re: Oregon License Plate Site in the News Tonight!
In-Reply-To: <2.2.32.19960808234932.00902f58@vertexgroup.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.GUL.3.95.960808172010.7089C-100000@Networking.Stanford.EDU>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


On Thu, 8 Aug 1996, John F. Fricker wrote:

> ObCypherpunks: How many people do you know that are working on a day to day
> basis with medical records systems, the District Attorney's computers, your
> doctor's computers, state Department of Health, and so on. I'm sure it's
> come up before but isn't this an obvious of application of encryption and
> PAK (Public Access to Keys)? Any legislation currently to _require_ that
> medical records and such be encrypted with access restricted. 

"Require"?

Wouldn't do shit. It's a social problem more than a technological problem.

-rich






Thread