1996-08-15 - Re: [NOISE] “X-Ray Gun” for imperceptible searches (fwd)

Header Data

From: Jim Choate <ravage@EINSTEIN.ssz.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 8c1672dfac2b759ea1a70b0bb8977362ce42ea294ea3e718fc91f014ddff6cde
Message ID: <199608150313.WAA08490@einstein>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-08-15 05:18:18 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 15 Aug 1996 13:18:18 +0800

Raw message

From: Jim Choate <ravage@EINSTEIN.ssz.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 1996 13:18:18 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: [NOISE] "X-Ray Gun" for imperceptible searches (fwd)
Message-ID: <199608150313.WAA08490@einstein>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text



Forwarded message:

> Date: Wed, 14 Aug 1996 22:24:39 -0400 (EDT)
> From: Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>
> Subject: Re: [NOISE] "X-Ray Gun" for imperceptible searches
> 
> Correct.  No warrant is required to observe that which is freely collected
> after eminating from the residence of another and observed off his
> property.
> 
> Same concept applies to the "sniff" test and ariel views into greenhouses.

Pitty somebody doesn't bring a suite against the FCC under this logic. It
would particularly impact radar detectors, cell phones, and other types of
scanners.

                                                 Jim Choate






Thread