1996-08-19 - Re: Netscape under Linux (Vs microsoft)

Header Data

From: qut@netcom.com (Roger Healy OBC)
To: scraver@mnet.fr (Arnauld Dravet)
Message Hash: ae5890356f8952868898a257b84d423aa3460c50eef1911b72a6c01a5d710535
Message ID: <199608190219.TAA03733@netcom.netcom.com>
Reply To: <32173372.25BEFC52@mnet.fr>
UTC Datetime: 1996-08-19 04:12:38 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 19 Aug 1996 12:12:38 +0800

Raw message

From: qut@netcom.com (Roger Healy OBC)
Date: Mon, 19 Aug 1996 12:12:38 +0800
To: scraver@mnet.fr (Arnauld Dravet)
Subject: Re: Netscape under Linux (Vs microsoft)
In-Reply-To: <32173372.25BEFC52@mnet.fr>
Message-ID: <199608190219.TAA03733@netcom.netcom.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


> > > Would it be possible to both supply an Linux ELF and a.out binary ?
> > 
> >   No, we will only be supplying ELF.  Since linux is not officially
> > supported, we really don't have the resources to do multiple versions.
> 
> yesterday i was in #linux on irc , and several pplreports some bugs with
> netscape under linux.i got some too many times a day... Netscape crashes
> when i try to load some HTML pages...i assume it shouldn't and we got
> ansolutly no probs with Netscape under windows.
> SO we just wondered if it's not a kind of support to micro$oft.
> Maybe Linux is 'not officially supported', but have to know unix is the
> most used OS, and that since Linux is free, many people use it. So when
> will you accept to recognize Linux as an entire OS ?? i just reinstalled
> Windows95 on a HD yesterday and it has already crached 2x. Windows is
> expensive and it crashes. Why should we pay for a fucked 'OS' ?

No shit.  I was thrilled to watch the entire disk overwritten by unix.  
Everthing which came with the system was boring and useless.  Gimmee BSD 
anyday, a socialist operating system


--
Love, Qut OBC





Thread