1996-08-31 - Re: www.anonymizer.com

Header Data

From: bf578@scn.org (SCN User)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: d66157db6b6984e4eef74de6f2de30e6748ea9481fa4feb05d45aaf5bfce9e7c
Message ID: <199608310245.TAA21234@scn.org>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-08-31 04:48:19 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 31 Aug 1996 12:48:19 +0800

Raw message

From: bf578@scn.org (SCN User)
Date: Sat, 31 Aug 1996 12:48:19 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: www.anonymizer.com
Message-ID: <199608310245.TAA21234@scn.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


>
>
>>
>>I have found and reported to the anonymizer that it does not 
>>always protect you against perl-based cgi scripts.  I did this by 
>>accessing a form-based email page (based on Matt's script) which includes 
>>environment variable values in the msg to the recipient.  I didn't 
>>receive any response back from them after I emailed them the info.
>
>
>   Am I missing something here because isn't the easiest way around all 
of this is simply not to enter your personal info when setting up 
Netscape?  Granted the page can pick up your ISP and what port you used, 
but so what?  It can't get your name and em
ail address.  Use a newsreader such as Free Agent so there's no reason 
to enter your personal info.  If there is a reason to respond to someone 
who's email is in on a particular page, then copy it and paste to your 
emailer... >
>
  I don't like getting the junk-email after visiting some pages, telling
  me what a great service they have (Hey I was just there!!), etc.


--
------------------------------------------
There are no facts, only interpretations.

I always wanted to be somebody, 





Thread