1996-08-01 - (Un)Freeh makes claims on wiretapping

Header Data

From: “E. ALLEN SMITH” <EALLENSMITH@ocelot.Rutgers.EDU>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: e72f69d68f6f19638a991e6b4079adb4774db51aa98498ae56eec13dbf3ff454
Message ID: <01I7RMDU1JC48Y4XOW@mbcl.rutgers.edu>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-08-01 23:33:41 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 2 Aug 1996 07:33:41 +0800

Raw message

From: "E. ALLEN SMITH" <EALLENSMITH@ocelot.Rutgers.EDU>
Date: Fri, 2 Aug 1996 07:33:41 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: (Un)Freeh makes claims on wiretapping
Message-ID: <01I7RMDU1JC48Y4XOW@mbcl.rutgers.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


	The usual governmental rhetoric. Again, I'm not seeing achnowledgement
from anyone except maybe the ACLU that there's no evidence that such tactics
would have stopped the TWA bombing - not that they would be justified even if
it would have. Legalized drugs, etcetera would free up quite enough law
enforcement to take care of the problem.
	-Allen

>   Cobb Group - Netscape

>           FBI DIRECTOR: WIRETAP PROPOSALS WON'T THREATEN LIBERTIES

>      Copyright &copy 1996 Nando.net
>      Copyright &copy 1996 The Associated Press
   
>   WASHINGTON (Aug 1, 1996 1:41 p.m. EDT) -- FBI Director Louis Freeh
>   said today Americans are under increasing attack by terrorists and
>   proposed new wiretapping authority would not greatly expand
>   government's powers.
   
>   "The country and the American people have been experiencing an
>   increasing war against them by terrorists and terrorist-supported
>   activities," Freeh told a Senate Intelligence Committee hearing.
>   Americans "are clearly under attack and we are the prime targets for
>   this kind of terrorism."
   
[...]

>   Freeh said the wiretap proposals do not involve "expansive powers" for
>   the government and would not lead to "an avalanche of new electronic
>   surveillance."
   
>   A leading GOP opponent of an earlier, more sweeping anti-terrorism
>   bill said today he didn't believe Congress could enact a new package
>   before its recess this weekend.
   
>   "I think it would be very difficult to do in light of the logistics
>   and the opposition," Rep. Bob Barr, R-Ga., told reporters. "The
>   (anti-terrorism) funding is there. No new laws are needed."
   
>   Asked about Barr's comments, Sen. Larry Craig, R-Idaho, head of a
>   bipartisan task force that has been negotiating with administration
>   officials on the anti-terrorism proposals, said, "That's part of the
>   obstacle. It's what we have to deal with. What we do has to reach the
>   level of consensus."
   
>   The negotiators, led by Craig and White House chief of staff Leon
>   Panetta, said they hoped to have a package ready for a vote by week's
>   end before Congress leaves for its August recess.





Thread