1996-09-01 - Re: Los Angeles Times article on Helsingius and anon.penet.fi

Header Data

From: Adamsc@io-online.com (Adamsc)
To: “loki@infonex.com>
Message Hash: 05abc2d657f6e4f3c933ea0cb10ef64e6326031564e8f927fc0065dd81139122
Message ID: <19960901041425937.AAA191@IO-ONLINE.COM>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-09-01 06:27:58 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 1 Sep 1996 14:27:58 +0800

Raw message

From: Adamsc@io-online.com (Adamsc)
Date: Sun, 1 Sep 1996 14:27:58 +0800
To: "loki@infonex.com>
Subject: Re: Los Angeles Times article on Helsingius and anon.penet.fi
Message-ID: <19960901041425937.AAA191@IO-ONLINE.COM>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


On Sat, 31 Aug 1996 14:54:37 -0700, Lance Cottrell wrote:

>>Note Esther Dyson's comments:
>>   "The damage that can be done by anonymity is far bigger" than in
>>   any other medium, said Esther Dyson, chairwoman of the Electronic
>>   Frontier Foundation. "In the end, you need to be able to get at
>>   somebody's identity to enforce accountability, and the question is how
>>   do you also enforce freedom of speech and freedom from prosecution for
>>   unpopular opinions."
<SNIP>

>Is this the official EFF position on remailers? This strong anti-remailer
>position needs to be retracted or widely publicized.

I doubt they'd publicize it; it'd probably cost them a *lot* of supporters.


- "'Anonymity is bad,' says a source who wishes to remain anonymous." - Nuff' said.
* Home: Chris Adams <adamsc@io-online.com> | http://www.io-online.com/adamsc/adamsc.htp
* Autoresponder: send email w/subject of "send resume" or "send PGPKEY"
* Work: cadams@acucobol.com | V.M. (619)515-4894 | (619)689-6579
* Member in good standing of the GNU whirled hors d'oeuvre






Thread