1996-09-08 - Re: What the NSA is patenting

Header Data

From: “<pstira@escape.com>” <pstira@escape.com>
To: pgut001@cs.auckland.ac.nz
Message Hash: 1a6a65a6e442c572fdd7b28eb012c2e78d90278bc66674ed3ea0d4f6f3b19ce0
Message ID: <Pine.BSI.3.91.960908150209.10432B-100000@escape.com>
Reply To: <84215235509971@cs26.cs.auckland.ac.nz>
UTC Datetime: 1996-09-08 21:15:53 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 9 Sep 1996 05:15:53 +0800

Raw message

From: "<pstira@escape.com>" <pstira@escape.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Sep 1996 05:15:53 +0800
To: pgut001@cs.auckland.ac.nz
Subject: Re: What the NSA is patenting
In-Reply-To: <84215235509971@cs26.cs.auckland.ac.nz>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSI.3.91.960908150209.10432B-100000@escape.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



On Sun, 8 Sep 1996 pgut001@cs.auckland.ac.nz wrote:

> >I'm sure there's going to be a REALLY marketable device out of this to get 
> >royalties off of.
>  
> No, the market for the more mainstream MFM's is small (a few K devices), for 
> MFSTM's it's even smaller (a few dozen?).  MFSTM's are usually built by 

You obviously did NOT detect my sarcasm about the previous subject.  :)

-Millie, who was trying to say that patenting such a device is patently 
stupid





Thread