1996-09-18 - Re: The GAK Momentum is Building…

Header Data

From: Jim Ray <liberty@gate.net>
To: liberty@gate.net
Message Hash: 2e918cd80b7b44ee07b289b03184822341201bb0540a65b8872022d6aa7d20e4
Message ID: <199609181600.MAA109012@osceola.gate.net>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-09-18 23:47:27 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 19 Sep 1996 07:47:27 +0800

Raw message

From: Jim Ray <liberty@gate.net>
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 1996 07:47:27 +0800
To: liberty@gate.net
Subject: Re: The GAK Momentum is Building...
Message-ID: <199609181600.MAA109012@osceola.gate.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

To: shamrock@netcom.com, liberty@gate.net, cypherpunks@toad.com
Date: Wed Sep 18 11:57:32 1996
Lucky wrote: 

> On Wed, 18 Sep 1996, Jim Ray wrote:

[my stuff about a small "victory" elided.]

> Nope. It is a Cypherpunk loss. The use of the term "key recovery" for GAK
> now fully obfuscates the distinction between accessing a 
> backup copy by the legitimate owner (or his estate, employer, etc.) and 
> GAK. Many PKIs will support the former type of key recovery. And for good
> reasons. Thanks to the brainwashers using the same term for GAK, it will
> now become impossible to tell from a basic description of a PKI if it 
> supports GAK or not. Furthermore, those who oppose the latter type of key
> recovery (us!), will be pushed further into the fringe by the media 
> now being able to mix up our arguments against GAK with arguing against 
> true key recovery. [Do you notice the weird constructs I have to use to 
> distinguish the two meanings? One of them being new...]

Upon further reflection, I agree with Lucky. I will say that the _really_ 
bad news is that our opponents seem to be getting smarter. <sigh> Or else 
I'm just getting dumber. :(

Also: If any more of you have comments for Judge Kozinski, please send them 
to me soon. Comments from stable nyms (such as you, Lucky) are especially 
appreciated, and with your permission I will include this message. Please 
tell me if you want me to include your e-mail address in the message to 
Judge Kozinski. TIA.
JMR


Regards, Jim Ray -- DNRC Minister of Encryption Advocacy

"As govt.s grow arithmetically, corruption grows exponentially."
 -- Ray's Law of official corruption.

 Defeat the Duopoly!             Stop the Browne out.
 Harry Browne for President. Jo Jorgensen for Vice-president.
 http://www.HarryBrowne96.org/   http://www.twr.com/stbo
___________________________________________________________________
PGP id.E9BD6D35 51 5D A2 C3 92 2C 56 BE  53 2D 9C A1 B3 50 C9 C8
I will generate a new (and bigger) PGP key-pair on election night.
<mailto:liberty@gate.net> http://www.shopmiami.com/prs/jimray
___________________________________________________________________

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2

iQCVAwUBMkAb8m1lp8bpvW01AQGwDQP/Wz8Bw27oXVzNt4gusljym5ardHFgCNDR
A3N8kXcL7rGRs2SFDBNYlodcTSh60d1FJTvLQ77oolMPWp3oQygZ+HLFEhwHK/GG
tt1VPavPhvpdPiXoDOcZKUm/vRobAJrvkfUEaeqI8hmzCVBq5YS/4m4KaD3XquWO
w0IyCViMVmw=
=ntqD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----






Thread