1996-09-19 - Re: cypherpunk listserve usefulness

Header Data

From: “Z.B.” <zachb@netcom.com>
To: Chip Mefford <cmefford@avwashington.com>
Message Hash: 745e75ee5d988d2b3c32b287dc945dab42e2c5cfce01eb2f45402e824ac99f8c
Message ID: <Pine.3.89.9609181209.A29790-0100000@netcom>
Reply To: <v03007801ae65b79e711a@[207.79.65.35]>
UTC Datetime: 1996-09-19 02:14:41 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 19 Sep 1996 10:14:41 +0800

Raw message

From: "Z.B." <zachb@netcom.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 1996 10:14:41 +0800
To: Chip Mefford <cmefford@avwashington.com>
Subject: Re: cypherpunk listserve usefulness
In-Reply-To: <v03007801ae65b79e711a@[207.79.65.35]>
Message-ID: <Pine.3.89.9609181209.A29790-0100000@netcom>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


On Wed, 18 Sep 1996, Chip Mefford wrote:
> 
> As much as it shames me, I have recently discovered that by filtering
> messages from only 2 participants and setting body filters on 3 keywords
> have remarkably improved the usefulness of this listserve.
> 
[snip]
>
> I guess that makes me a censor and it has me reexamining some things.
> 

No, you're not a censor.  You are merely determining what *you* choose to 
read.  That's perfectly acceptable - probably a lot of people on this 
list also filter their messages to some extent.  Now, if you tried to 
force the rest of us to abide by the standards that you set for yourself, 
then you would be trying to censor us.  There is a big difference here.


---

Zach Babayco

zachb@netcom.com  <----- finger for PGP public key
http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Park/4127







Thread