1996-09-27 - Re: Hallam-Baker demands more repudiations or he’ll write!

Header Data

From: “Jean-Francois Avon” <jf_avon@citenet.net>
To: snow <snow@smoke.suba.com>
Message Hash: c053097c76a4d7ae1d1ec1bf26ddd528aafb0d9c2932afe1d544886a5331a512
Message ID: <9609270430.AA06876@cti02.citenet.net>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-09-27 06:40:47 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 27 Sep 1996 14:40:47 +0800

Raw message

From: "Jean-Francois Avon" <jf_avon@citenet.net>
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 1996 14:40:47 +0800
To: snow <snow@smoke.suba.com>
Subject: Re: Hallam-Baker demands more repudiations or he'll write!
Message-ID: <9609270430.AA06876@cti02.citenet.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


On 26 Sep 96 at 20:46, snow wrote:

>      Having been a firefighter for about 4 years, I can say that for
>      
> small fires water works quite a bit better. For larger fires (over a
> hundred acres or so) setting a backfire, or burning out the fuel in
> the direction the fire is probably going to go is a hell of a lot
> easier than hauling millons and millions of gallons or
> blood^h^h^h^h^h water.
> 
> Petro, Christopher C.
> petro@suba.com <prefered for any non-list stuff>
> snow@smoke.suba.com

Well, let's not debate over firefighting, a lousy analogy...

As long as Canadair sells water bombers, let them do.  It brings 
money to Montreal...

:)

As for Jim Bell, he would probably say that he just proposes to use 
your techniques. :)

jfa





Thread