1996-09-07 - Re: Metcalf and Other Net.Fogies

Header Data

From: Alan Olsen <alano@teleport.com>
To: tcmay@got.net (Timothy C. May)
Message Hash: d9139432058258d0c6d71f498bccb5cd2ea84d761ed0cafeea65049511124701
Message ID: <3.0b15.32.19960906182157.0101cd6c@mail.teleport.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-09-07 04:58:08 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 7 Sep 1996 12:58:08 +0800

Raw message

From: Alan Olsen <alano@teleport.com>
Date: Sat, 7 Sep 1996 12:58:08 +0800
To: tcmay@got.net (Timothy C. May)
Subject: Re: Metcalf and Other Net.Fogies
Message-ID: <3.0b15.32.19960906182157.0101cd6c@mail.teleport.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


At 10:27 AM 9/5/96 -0700, Timothy C. May wrote:

>Robert Metcalfe, inventor of Ethernet and founder of 3COM, and how
>publisher of "Infoworld" and sailing enthusiast, was interviewed on CNBC a
>few minutes ago. He repeated his prediction of an "Internet collapse" in
>1996, based on overuse, on bad pricing models, on lack of controls, and on
>other concerns.

Some are griping just to gripe.  Metcalfe may have a valid prediction here.

I have a machine that I use for work that is connected to the net via
ethernet.  No 28.8k bottlenecks involved.  Most of the time I am lucky if I
can exceed 14K bps to anything outside the local area.  When I run
traceroutes, the blockage is in MCI or Sprintnet land.  (Except for the one
to ftp.funet.fi early this week where where two of the machines somewhere
in California were caught in some sort of weird DNS loop.)

The bandwidth to the net has been oversold.  If the government were
*Really* concerned about "protecting the net", they would be on MCI and
Sprint's cases, not looking for virtual terrorists.  (Virtual Terrorists
are to Terrorists the same way that Virtual Reality is to actual reality.)
There have been days where you could not move anything at any reasonable
speed from certain areas of the country.

Yes, people have been predicting the end of the net (GIF/JPEG/WAV at 11!)
since it was founded.  In this case, I think that the person has enough
network experience to be right.  With the way things are now with oversold
bandwidth, the DNS numbers getting close to being used up, many of the
routers needing to be replaced and/or upgraded, and software that uses
bandwidth like candy (phone conversations, video conferencing, huge
interactive web page animations (like shockwave), real audio, and more as
the marketing droids can sell you on it.), the chances of a west coast
power-system style collapse does not seem that far from reality.  (There
are many who I know in the industry that are amazed that it has lasted this
long.)

On a smaller scale, those collapses happen in a small regional area, get
fixed and things go on.  But just like the earthquakes in California,
everyone is waiting for "the Big One".  (At least this one is preventable.
Lets hope that the fixes can occur before the government gets involved,
otherwise the net *IS* really doomed.)

---
Alan Olsen -- alano@teleport.com -- Contract Web Design & Instruction
        `finger -l alano@teleport.com` for PGP 2.6.2 key 
                http://www.teleport.com/~alano/ 
  "We had to destroy the Internet in order to save it." - Sen. Exon
                "Microsoft -- Nothing but NT promises."







Thread