1996-10-13 - Re: SPA sues C2, other ISPs and users

Header Data

From: Duncan Frissell <frissell@panix.com>
To: Greg Broiles <ghio@myriad.alias.net>
Message Hash: 0487e6cd5015204d1263aa1a57462b52ece391062a2d3d461a53125bcdbcc620
Message ID: <3.0b19.32.19961013065552.00ed6354@panix.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-10-13 10:55:41 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 13 Oct 1996 03:55:41 -0700 (PDT)

Raw message

From: Duncan Frissell <frissell@panix.com>
Date: Sun, 13 Oct 1996 03:55:41 -0700 (PDT)
To: Greg Broiles <ghio@myriad.alias.net>
Subject: Re: SPA sues C2, other ISPs and users
Message-ID: <3.0b19.32.19961013065552.00ed6354@panix.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


At 03:34 AM 10/13/96 -0700, Greg Broiles wrote:
>In the Ninth Circuit, the standard for contributory infringement is "[o]ne
>who, with knowledge of the infringing activity, induces, causes, or
>materially contributes to the infringing conduct of another, may be held
>liable as a 'contributory' infringer". _Fonovisa v. Cherry Auction_ 96
>C.D.O.S. 517 (CA9, 1996) 

But how will a civil action be effective as soon as millions of people have
10 mb/s full-time net connections and can be their own ISPs and judgment
proof at the same time?

DCF





Thread