From: apteryx@super.zippo.com (Mark Heaney)
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 1996 13:53:12 -0700 (PDT)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Why not PGP?
Message-ID: <3267823e.85486825@super.zippo.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Jim Ray wrote:

>Rollo Silver wrote:

[snip]

>> 2. Suppose someone writes a program Z that has no expicit crypto code in
>> it, but has hooks for installing one or another version of PGP. Given a
>> copy of Z, someone in this country could install PGP he got from MIT,
>> whereas someone in Europe could install the international version.
>> Would export of Z violate ITAR restrictions?
>
>Yes.
>JMR

Does this mean that exporting Private Idaho, PGPfront, WinPGP, etc. would
be a violation of ITAR because they function only when combined with PGP
and contain "hooks" for using PGP?

I don't recall any restrictions on who could download these files from
their host sites.

Mark

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2

iQB1AwUBMl6ZSN36bir1/qfZAQGUWAMAmbh59CK2wMBt/AVCEcwoiknVgIYMNRmS
B2s4YJyvq5QQnUkynUcMSU17vltRhwQyapz22lg4rZZxYIoEC0P3vVDkH3mPCnnE
qPSMtwtV+o1//cOQHjD7VfjeScO69R7u
=Np5A
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-----------------------------------------------------------------
Mark Heaney    finger snipe@starburst.cbl.cees.edu for public key
PGP Fingerprint= BB D8 9B 07 51 87 05 AC  47 7B F2 4F A6 AB 1A CD   
-----------------------------------------------------------------
You keep using that word, I dunna think it means what you think it means.