1996-10-06 - Re: Fw: Re: ITAR satellite provision

Header Data

From: Adamsc@io-online.com (Adamsc)
To: “Greg Broiles” <deviant@pooh-corner.com>
Message Hash: 56e28333e68525e4e6e8dad2a2f3f90fba1a1eefeaef99dee222bef921908248
Message ID: <19961006044138000.AAA193@GIGANTE>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-10-06 06:26:24 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 6 Oct 1996 14:26:24 +0800

Raw message

From: Adamsc@io-online.com (Adamsc)
Date: Sun, 6 Oct 1996 14:26:24 +0800
To: "Greg Broiles" <deviant@pooh-corner.com>
Subject: Re: Fw: Re: ITAR satellite provision
Message-ID: <19961006044138000.AAA193@GIGANTE>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


On Sat, 5 Oct 1996 05:43:39 -0400 (EDT), The Deviant wrote:

>> >So.. if I were to take PGP, put it on a floppy disk, tape it to a model
>> >rocket, and launch it across the mexican border, that's not exporting it
>> >(although the FAA might complain)?

>> As I read the regs, it's not an export at the moment it's launched, but
>> it's almost certainly an export when it reaches Mexican airspace or when it
>> touches Mexican soil.

>Well now, I didn't send it accross the border.  I sent it up.  wind sent
>it accross the border.

That's kind of like saying "I didn't export PGP, I just handed a diskette to
my Iraqi friend at the airport as he left - what he did with it is his
responsibility"

#  Chris Adams <adamsc@io-online.com>   | http://www.io-online.com/adamsc/adamsc.htp
#  <cadams@acucobol.com>		 | send mail with subject "send PGPKEY"
"That's our advantage at Microsoft; we set the standards and we can change them."
   --- Karen Hargrove, Microsoft (quoted in the Feb 1993 Unix Review editorial)







Thread