1996-10-09 - Re: Microsoft CAPI

Header Data

From: Mike McNally <m5@tivoli.com>
To: Ravi Pandya <rpandya@netcom.com>
Message Hash: 7e0a26303a3a026a9c833ac571442a481a4b16121cc00efd6d3129a8698513be
Message ID: <325BD6C6.715F@tivoli.com>
Reply To: <2.2.32.19961009152246.006be444@netcom8.netcom.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-10-09 16:48:23 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 9 Oct 1996 09:48:23 -0700 (PDT)

Raw message

From: Mike McNally <m5@tivoli.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Oct 1996 09:48:23 -0700 (PDT)
To: Ravi Pandya <rpandya@netcom.com>
Subject: Re: Microsoft CAPI
In-Reply-To: <2.2.32.19961009152246.006be444@netcom8.netcom.com>
Message-ID: <325BD6C6.715F@tivoli.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Ravi Pandya wrote:
> ... You can't load an encryption engine into Windows 95 or 
> Windows NT unless that engine has been specially signed by 
> Microsoft's corporate key.

And so what happens when the Microsoft key is compromised?  It might
be hard to break by purely cryptographic means, but surely there are
some people at Microsoft who aren't millionaires.

______c_________________________________________________________________
Mike M Nally * IBM % Tivoli * Austin TX  * How quickly we forget that
mailto:m5@tivoli.com mailto:m101@io.com  * "deer processing" and "data
http://www.io.com/~m101/                 * processing" are different!





Thread