1996-10-30 - Re: When did Mondex ever claim to be anonymous?

Header Data

From: stewarts@ix.netcom.com
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: cb8686aaf3aaabeaab2d052a1b8aac8e494d17716aab34a3895f1587b2defed9
Message ID: <1.5.4.32.19961030090327.00397f24@popd.ix.netcom.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-10-30 09:05:28 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 30 Oct 1996 01:05:28 -0800 (PST)

Raw message

From: stewarts@ix.netcom.com
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 1996 01:05:28 -0800 (PST)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: When did Mondex ever claim to be anonymous?
Message-ID: <1.5.4.32.19961030090327.00397f24@popd.ix.netcom.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


>>> I don't think spreading false rumours is a good idea - it can discredit
>>> the spreader if anyone bothers to check any details.

>>Disinformation is a time-honoured weapon in political struggle.

Foo.  There's so much totally outrageous stuff the government _does_
that we don't have to go giving them ideas about _more_ things to do.

And ethics aside (:-), bogus rumours get you lumped in with the folks who
think Space Aliens fired that shot from the Grassy Knoll in a plot
to kidnap Elvis.  It's hard enough not to get treated like that
when you're telling the truth, especially about issues where the
government knows it's cheating.


#			Thanks;  Bill
# Bill Stewart, +1-415-442-2215 stewarts@ix.netcom.com
# You can get PGP outside the US at ftp.ox.ac.uk
  Imagine if three million people voted for somebody they _knew_,
  and the politicians had to count them all.






Thread