1996-11-08 - Re: Why is cryptoanarchy irreversible?

Header Data

From: The Deviant <deviant@pooh-corner.com>
To: Peter Hendrickson <ph@netcom.com>
Message Hash: 2e8fa54cefb450a1080ac5287296662f1ea5852b991eb004b1d9c2fee1415510
Message ID: <Pine.LNX.3.94.961108023719.811A-100000@random.sp.org>
Reply To: <v02140b0baea80ee121af@[192.0.2.1]>
UTC Datetime: 1996-11-08 02:38:44 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 7 Nov 1996 18:38:44 -0800 (PST)

Raw message

From: The Deviant <deviant@pooh-corner.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Nov 1996 18:38:44 -0800 (PST)
To: Peter Hendrickson <ph@netcom.com>
Subject: Re: Why is cryptoanarchy irreversible?
In-Reply-To: <v02140b0baea80ee121af@[192.0.2.1]>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.94.961108023719.811A-100000@random.sp.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


On Thu, 7 Nov 1996, Peter Hendrickson wrote:

> > If I understand the reasoning, people beleive it is easier to prevent the
> > release of strong crypto. techiniques than to remove them once they are
> > released.
> 
> The reasons underlying this are what I don't completely understand.
> 
> > Once a terrorist has strong crypto, why should they stop using it if it
> > becomes illegal?
> 
> Use of strong crypto would be a tip off that one is a terrorist.
> 
> If strong cryptography were unpopular and highly illegal, very few
> people would be using it.  This makes it easy to identify suspects.
> 
> Peter Hendrickson
> ph@netcom.com
> 

If crypto is made a criminal offense, only criminals will use crypto.

 --Deviant
I have discovered that all human evil comes from this, man's being
unable to sit still in a room.
		-- Blaise Pascal







Thread