From: Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>
Date: Sun, 17 Nov 1996 01:12:58 -0800 (PST)
To: Huge Cajones Remailer <nobody@huge.cajones.com>
Subject: Re: The Utility of Privacy
In-Reply-To: <199611170222.SAA10990@mailmasher.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.94.961117041113.2926A-100000@polaris>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


On Sat, 16 Nov 1996, Huge Cajones Remailer wrote:

> Date: Sat, 16 Nov 1996 18:22:33 -0800
> From: Huge Cajones Remailer <nobody@huge.cajones.com>
> To: cypherpunks@toad.com
> Subject: The Utility of Privacy
> 
> 
> Privacy is a hassle.  Is it worth it?
> 
> Which unfortunate situations does privacy prevent?  What are the odds
> that they will occur?  How much effort will it take to prevent these
> outcomes?  As a model, use the present and future situation of a
> typical reader of this list.

Insurance is a hassle.  Is it worth it?

Which unfortunate situations does insurance prevent?  What are the odds
that they will occur?  How much effort will it take to prevent these
outcomes?  As a model, use the present and future situation of a
typical reader of this list.


--
Forward complaints to : European Association of Envelope Manufactures
Finger for Public Key   Gutenbergstrasse 21;Postfach;CH-3001;Bern
Vote Monarchist         Switzerland