1996-11-07 - Re: Judge Kozinski responds to our responses

Header Data

From: frantz@netcom.com (Bill Frantz)
To: Jim Ray <cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 51131ce7f1bd97b1baba5998e7f8f1a2948107a5ec8b53f37531eb5f655621e9
Message ID: <199611070705.XAA05794@netcom6.netcom.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-11-07 07:05:48 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 6 Nov 1996 23:05:48 -0800 (PST)

Raw message

From: frantz@netcom.com (Bill Frantz)
Date: Wed, 6 Nov 1996 23:05:48 -0800 (PST)
To: Jim Ray <cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Judge Kozinski responds to our responses
Message-ID: <199611070705.XAA05794@netcom6.netcom.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


At  4:39 AM 11/6/96 -0500, Jim Ray wrote:
>Judge Kozinski wrote:
>> ... Perhaps the answer
>> is that the post office should not accept mail unless there
>> is a clear indication of who the sender is on the upper left
>> hand corner of the envelope. ...

In the case of postal mail, return address forgery is so easy that anyone
who can address an envelope can figure it out.  Requiring something
scribbled there certainly wouldn't help protect against anonymous mail. 
You would have to couple it with "is a person" checks to ensure the person
posting it is the person referenced by the return address.  Bye bye corner
post box.


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bill Frantz       |                            | Periwinkle -- Consulting
(408)356-8506     |  This space for rent.      | 16345 Englewood Ave.
frantz@netcom.com |                            | Los Gatos, CA 95032, USA







Thread