1996-11-14 - Re: “Freedom Knights” are closet censors

Header Data

From: Rich Graves <rcgraves@ix.netcom.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 579603099e1cf036484c5367fff1500f08342fdc641683e8631393d8dfb458ed
Message ID: <328B967F.5478@ix.netcom.com>
Reply To: <Pine.GSO.3.95.961114070057.11045F-100000@well.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-11-14 22:00:57 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 14 Nov 1996 14:00:57 -0800 (PST)

Raw message

From: Rich Graves <rcgraves@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 1996 14:00:57 -0800 (PST)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: "Freedom Knights" are closet censors
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.3.95.961114070057.11045F-100000@well.com>
Message-ID: <328B967F.5478@ix.netcom.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Declan McCullagh wrote:
> 
> What is "censoring other people's censorship?" Say I argue in favor of 
> the CDA. Would you censor me then? Why not? Isn't this censoring 
> others censorship?
> 
> I wonder why the so-called "Freedom Knights" are so insecure in their
> beliefs that they will not tolerate a dissenting voice on their 
> mailing list. (Let's forget for the moment that my point in 
> subscribing was to disrupt it. That's not the point, is it? "More
> speech, more speech!")

Declan, why won't you let me on the so-called fight-censorship list? 
Just asking.

-rich





Thread