1996-11-18 - Re: What do our Netscape folks have to say?

Header Data

From: Tom Weinstein <tomw@netscape.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 585396f7cc9f3c9ca792244184f5500322af6ce0b6e6840b57c0f344d25ca313
Message ID: <3290E95B.15FB@netscape.com>
Reply To: <Pine.3.89.9611171813.A12245-0100000@netcom14>
UTC Datetime: 1996-11-18 22:54:59 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 18 Nov 1996 14:54:59 -0800 (PST)

Raw message

From: Tom Weinstein <tomw@netscape.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 1996 14:54:59 -0800 (PST)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: What do our Netscape folks have to say?
In-Reply-To: <Pine.3.89.9611171813.A12245-0100000@netcom14>
Message-ID: <3290E95B.15FB@netscape.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Timothy C. May wrote:
>
> At 6:44 PM -0800 11/17/96, Lucky Green wrote:
>
>> I have a hard time believing that Netscape caved. As I wrote in July,
>> HP was working on selling our children's birthright to obtain an
>> export license for their product. But Netscape participating in this
>> just doesn't sound right.
>
> Indeed, some comments from the usually-vocal Weinstein brothers would
> be most welcome.

Our position on hardware crypto is that if it has a PKCS#11 interface,
we'll probably support it.  To the best of my knowledge, we aren't
endorsing the HP scheme in particular.

-- 
You should only break rules of style if you can    | Tom Weinstein
coherently explain what you gain by so doing.      | tomw@netscape.com





Thread