1996-11-08 - Re: Universal Service for the Net: Why it’s a bad idea

Header Data

From: Frank Willoughby <frankw@in.net>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 6978237edb321f8c86ec64bff7b3a6b4c621dfd0bba0bacb8de9a96de6854fd3
Message ID: <9611082306.AA24281@su1.in.net>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-11-08 23:08:26 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 8 Nov 1996 15:08:26 -0800 (PST)

Raw message

From: Frank Willoughby <frankw@in.net>
Date: Fri, 8 Nov 1996 15:08:26 -0800 (PST)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Universal Service for the Net: Why it's a bad idea
Message-ID: <9611082306.AA24281@su1.in.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


At 07:53 AM 11/8/96 -0800, Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com> wrote:

8< [snip]

>* Why should a Beverly Hills high school get a discount of 20 percent?
>  Can't they afford to pay for ISDN?

Depends on how their telco's tariffs are set up.  Here in Indiana,
we have a monopoly called "Ameritech" who, out of the kindness of 
their hearts, charges ***per-minute*** ISDN rates.  Expect costs 
of over $600/month for a permament connection (one line) to the 
Internet.  Beverly Hills High School *might* be able to afford it.
Most other places can't.  <sigh>

Best Regards,


Frank

  
Any sufficiently advanced bug is indistinguishable from a feature.
	-- Rich Kulawiec

<standard disclaimer>
The opinions expressed above are of the author and may not 
necessarily be representative of Fortified Networks Inc.

Fortified Networks Inc. - Vendor-Neutral Information Security Consulting 
http://www.fortified.com     Phone: (317) 573-0800     FAX: (317) 573-0817     
Home of the Free Internet Firewall Evaluation Checklist








Thread